LASIK-Flap

Uncovering secrets of the laser eye surgery industry

The LASIK Report

A Call for the Discontinuation of a Harmful Procedure
It is currently Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Is this for real??????
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:02 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 6:57 pm
Posts: 14
From http://www.nylvc.com/html/lasik-experie ... counseling

LASIK Preparation

Next, either Mariebelle or Gabrielle, our laser technicians, will call you into our state-of-the-art laser suite for your procedure. Before you enter the suite, the laser will be calibrated, and all of the tools needed for your LASIK procedure will be prepared. After your name is confirmed, you will take a seat in the laser chair. We will administer a disinfectant preparation to your eyelid area and instill drops to numb your eye. To make the process more comfortable, you will be given a teddy bear to hold and you will hear music in the background (aww how sweet!!!! Has Teddy had this procedure done too?).

Lasik Procedure

Dr. Mandel will ask you to open your eye and focus on a flashing light. A lid holder will keep your eye open, and Dr. Mandel will ask you to tell him when the flashing light disappears. You will feel a vibration for about 10 to 15 seconds, and then the light will reappear. The light will then become blurry. At this point, you will hear the sound of the laser and notice the smell of the laser gases (I didnt' know lasers smelled). :roll:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this for real??????
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:58 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3109
bearsfan_54 wrote:
At this point, you will hear the sound of the laser and notice the smell of the laser gases (I didnt' know lasers smelled). :roll:


It's the smell of burning corneal tissue.

http://www.eyeworld.org/article.php?sid=662

EyeWorld
June 01

Quote:
In ophthalmology, when the excimer laser strikes the cornea, a thin layer of corneal cells is released. These cells create a plume of tissue that scatters into the air seconds after the laser strikes. The plume consists of carbonized tissue, blood, and the gases benzene, toluene, and formaldehyde, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.


Quote:
In December 2000, following 36 consecutive laser in-situ keratomileusis cases, Jarstad developed sudden shortness of breath with squeezing substernal chest pain and a pressure sensation, palpitations, and lightheadedness, along with a feeling of impending doom. When the symptoms would not fully subside 15 minutes after nitroglycerin and an aspirin, he went to the emergency department of his community hospital.

"After spending the next 24 hours in the cardiac intensive care unit and having negative enzymes and electrocardiogram, I underwent cardiac catheterization the following day. No coronary artery obstruction was identified and I was discharged without a definitive diagnosis, but possible coronary artery vasospasm," said Jarstad, who is also president, Washington Academy of Eye Physicians & Surgeons, Seattle.

In addition to his health problems, he said, his laser operator and circulating nurse have also complained of "bronchitis" following a day of LASIK cases.


Quote:
In another case reported in 1998 in EyeWorld, Jerald L. Tennant, MD, a refractive surgeon from Texas, was forced to retire due to health problems he believes may have been caused by airborne corneal particles or viruses contained in the plume generated from the laser. Tennant, developed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a rare condition in non HIV-positive adults, in which the body's immune system produces antibodies that attack and destroy platelets. Another ophthalmologist, who prefers to remain anonymous, also developed ITP since beginning to use the excimer laser in 1990. "The incidence of ITP in the general public is rare," Tennant said. "To have two excimer laser surgeons develop ITP after the same amount of exposure is suspicious. That is why I have recommended that excimer surgeons follow their platelet count until the issue is resolved."


Quote:
"Most ophthalmologists know a LASIK surgeon with laser lungs," she said, adding that many surgeons have asthma and experience the loss of their voices.

"My staff is very concerned about it; they know LASIK technicians with chronic coughs," she added.


http://www.eyeworld.org/article.php?sid=1121

EyeWorld
Feb 01

Quote:
During the surgery, when a laser or electrosurgical unit is used, thermal destruction of tissue creates a smoke byproduct (plume). In ophthalmology, when the excimer laser strikes the cornea, a thin layer of corneal cells is released. These cells create a plume of tissue that scatters into the air seconds after the laser strikes.

Steven J. Dell, MD, of Austin, Texas, clinical instructor of ophthalmology, Tulane University, New Orleans, said that aspirating this cloud away as rapidly as possible will produce a more uniform ablation pattern. "Additionally, most proposed culprits in diffuse lamellar keratitis [DLK], such as Betadine [povidone-iodine, Purdue Frederick], bacterial endotoxins, or polishing compounds, can be aspirated. Removing these substances from the stromal bed seems prudent," he said.

Another concern is that the laser plume may transport infectious diseases or viruses, such as HIV-AIDS or hepatitis. He said that it might take years to definitively determine if the laser plume is dangerous to the surgical staff. However, the dangers of breathing plume smoke from CO2 lasers are documented in dermatology literature. "The typical particle size in the plume of an excimer laser is on the order of 120 nm, which is in the general range of coal dust and several compounds in cigarette smoke. It is conceivable that the plume might also contain prions, and the consequences of breathing this material are totally unknown," Dell said.


http://www.mastel.com/pdf/BO_4951-23.pdf

_________________
Broken Eyes

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Is this for real??????
PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:14 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3109
bearsfan_54 wrote:
A lid holder will keep your eye open, and Dr. Mandel will ask you to tell him when the flashing light disappears.


Oh, I almost forgot... when the flashing light disappears, the patient has gone blind from retinal artery occlusion due to the suction ring used to cut the flap.

_________________
Broken Eyes

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:31 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3109
http://www.neovisioneyecenter.com/laser ... _faq2.html

Quote:
Vascular occlusion: When the suction ring is applied to the eye to create a corneal flap, the pressure inside the eye increases significantly and most patients notice either a dimming or a complete loss of light in the eye. As the suction ring is removed, the vision is restored within a few seconds. There is a less than 1 in 1,000,000 probability that when the suction ring interrupts the blood supply to the eye, permanent damage to the retina and loss of vision can result.

_________________
Broken Eyes

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:19 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 214
http://idinchildren.com/199710/frameset ... =child.asp

"Stuffed animals and blankets are other contrasting ideas between pediatricians and educators. Although educators suggest having these soft items, they only "harbor disease," Poole said, because children rub against them, slobber on and wipe their nose on them making it impossible to keep them clean. If blankets and stuffed animals, are present, they must be washed routinely."


Last edited by kaleyedoscope on Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 
 Post subject: That Teddy bear may be spreading infection
PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:39 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:06 pm
Posts: 706
I highly doubt LASIK centers wash their Teddy bears between patients. Good grief, many of them re-use microkeratome blades to save effort and money!

Never trust your precious vision to a corneal refractive surgeon! He or she is placing a higher value on making money than your vision and eye health. No conscientious physician, in my opinion, would perform corneal refractive surgery in the context of literature available today... literature demonstrating that all forms of corneal refractive surgery cause permanent harm to every eye and typically reduce visual quality.

_________________
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark. The real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light. -Plato


Last edited by Scientist on Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 08, 2007 2:55 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3109
http://www.ophmanagement.com/article.aspx?article=86452

Ophthalmology Management
October 2005

Quote:
Plume generated during LASIK surgery can present several potential troublesome operational outcomes and patient/surgeon health problems. Plume is created when the excimer laser pulse strikes cornea water vapor and live and dead cellular debris located in the surgical field. Ejection of the biocomponents is due to the resulting photomechanical effects of UV-energy transfer to tissue at the corneal surface. The ablation process breaks the nitrogen peptide bonds in cellular proteins generating plume "smoke," an aerosol that can result in a beam-blocking effect as the plume hangs over the ablating stromal bed blocking subsequent laser pulses. The plume composition includes water vapor, cellular and carbonized tissue, blood and viruses in conjunction with benzene, hydrogen cyanide, toluene gases, formaldehyde and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

The "burning flesh" odor resulting from the excimer laser beam is strong and stenchful to the physician, nurses and patients in the operating room. In addition, the aerosol plume particles attach to hair, clothing, surfaces of surgical equipment and exposed skin, and can heighten patient anxiety.

_________________
Broken Eyes

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 1:35 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3109
http://www.ophmanagement.com/article.aspx?article=85072
Ophthalmology Management
April 2001
Where There's Smoke . . .
By: Christopher Kent, Senior Associate Editor
Eliminating LASIK laser plume may have a host of beneficial effects -- including improving your outcomes.

Quote:
Removal of the "burning flesh" odor is not only more pleasant for the patient, but can save you embarrassment. "Ninety-nine out of 100 patients don't smell the plume when I use the Mastel system," says Dr. Dudley. "After telling them this is a 'cold laser,' this saves me from having to explain why a cold laser makes a burning smell."

_________________
Broken Eyes

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato


Top
 
 Post subject: the gift that keeps on giving even to the surgeon and
PostPosted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 9:26 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 214
and staff.

http://www.revophth.com/index.asp?page=1_833.htm

Is Your Health at Risk?

When laser plume is not contained, individuals present at the surgery are virtually certain to inhale some of the particles and gases being produced. The anecdotal evidence of health trouble—some mild, some serious—is plentiful. Clinical studies, however, have been relatively few. Nevertheless, the existing data does provide reason for concern.

Elements that have been identified in laser plume include the gases benzene, hydrogen cyanide, toluene, formaldehyde, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.1,2 Studies of excimer laser plume smoke have found that live viruses can be isolated from the plume evacuate.3,4,5 Other laser studies have also shown that bacteria, viruses and DNA can survive laser ablation.6,7,8 (The dermatology literature contains multiple references to the health problems resulting from breathing plume smoke emitted during CO2 laser use.) The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration have both stated that plume smoke should be evacuated and treated as infectious waste.

Some of the particles created are between 1.0 and 0.4 µm,9 the same size range as coal or asbestos dust, making the particles invisible and lighter than air. Unless contained, they remain floating in the air, as coal dust does. In addition, excimer lasers are often calibrated by vaporizing test plates made of materials such as vinyl, polymethylmethacrylate and aluminum mylar; the consequences of breathing the laser plume from these materials is not known.

About a year and a half ago, Matthew Niemeyer, MD, a resident in ophthalmology under Howard V. Gimbel, MD, at Loma Linda University, conducted a survey of ophthalmology personnel in the United States designed to look at the effects of laser plume on the health of those who are regularly exposed to it. About 250 surveys (out of 500) were completed and returned. The control group (about 125 respondents) consisted of ophthalmologists and technicians who work in the same clinic or building as the people using excimer lasers, but do not use a laser as part of their surgeries or other procedures.

The results showed a highly statistically significant difference between the groups; personnel exposed to laser plume had more symptoms as a group than other doctors working in the same buildings. Those who were exposed to the plume reported a significantly greater amount of runny nose, cough and allergy problems—primarily respiratory symptoms. (Differences in more serious conditions such as autoimmune disease were not significant.)

Like any good scientist, most ophthalmologists prefer to take action only when clinical evidence is substantial and compelling. However, long-term health risks can take years to establish clinically, by which point considerable damage may have been done.


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 1:48 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 214
http://www.crstodayarchive.com/03_archive/0603/111.html

"Although there has never been a documented case of an infectious agent transmitted by plume smoke, some surgeons have voiced the concern that they may be at risk. When operating on patients who are unknowing carriers of hepatitis C or hepatitis B or who hail from countries where prions taint the food supply, for example, could refractive surgeons be in danger of contracting infection? During excimer laser ablation, innumerable protein fragments from vaporized keratocytes and perhaps the occasional infectious microbe launch off the patient’s corneal surface at a high velocity. As surgeons, we should consider that we carry all our patients with us in the form of microscopic particulates in our lungs."


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:37 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 306
http://www.lsms.org/Pubs/Journal/Jan_2007.pdf (this link is not working)

From the full text:

Stage II begins when the corneal flap is reflected (opening the incision) and is completed with the corneal flap returned and sealed in its original position (closure of the incision): surgical incision exposure to surgical incision closure. During this stage invasive solids and fluids can arise owing to the involuntary introduction of infectious organisms, epithelial cells, debris, oils, etc. into the stroma after the corneal flap is reflected back off the corneal surface. Manipulations of the epithelial surfaces, flap, flap bed, introduction and extraneous use of instruments at the interface, flap folding, irrigation and cleansing of the surface, coupled with possible contaminations from the eyelashes, stromal bed tissue, tear ducts, proliferation and/or migration of epithelial cells, and the limbus throughout the second stage of the LASIK procedure may contribute to less than desirable outcomes.

Moreover, splatter from the ablation plume can partially mask the laser beam impairing the laser’s efficiency and could create undesired outcomes that require future surgical correction. Excimer surgeons sometimes have observed the generated plume to carry large particles, which can drop out onto the surgical field creating additional contamination in the region of the incision. These particles also may adhere after splattering onto the laser’s last optic resulting in irregular etching. Both events cause grief for the surgeon and patient and may require complex surgical intervention in an attempt to correct poor outcomes. Additionally, splatter, smoke, and large particles are possible health and safety issues for the surgeon, medical staff, and patient.

_________________
Bill

"What concerns me is that if the person informing the patient is themselves poorly or inaccurately informed then how on earth can consent ever be truly informed?" Dr. Sarah Smith


Top
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 11:18 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 7:23 am
Posts: 3109
PTT

_________________
Broken Eyes

"The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits